Seizure of the goods of the godown without jurisdiction may amount to misconduct
The Hon’ble Allahabad High Court in Mahavir Polyplast Pvt. Ltd. v. the State of U.P. And 2 others [Writ Tax No. 57 of 2020 and Writ Tax No. 58 of 2020 dated August 6, 2022] quashed the orders of the GST officials for seizing the goods of the assessee inside the godown without jurisdiction. The court also directed the Commissioner Commercial Tax UP to look into the matter, and take appropriate action commensurate to the misconduct, if any.
Facts:
Mahavir Polyplast Pvt. Ltd. (“the Petitioner”) is a manufacturer of PVC pipes and it has established its manufacturing unit at Tehsil-Kirawali, Agra. They store all its raw materials and manufactured goods at a godown located on the same premises.
The business premises of the Petitioner was subjected to a search and seizure operation by the Special Investigation Branch (“SIB”) of the Commercial Tax Department, Agra dated August 7, 2018 and described them as “Vahan Sankhiya UPGODOWN02” and “Vahan Sankhiya GODOWON”. A Panchnama was drawn on the same day mentioning the allegation of shortage of physical stocks as compared to that recorded in the stock registers.
Show cause notices dated August 9, 2018 and August 14, 2018 (“SCNs”) were issued by the Assistant Commissioner (Mobile Squad), Unit-II Agra, and Assistant Commissioner (Mobile Squad) -5 Agra (“the Department”) respectively under Section 129(3) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (“the CGST Act”) with respect to “Vahan Sankhiya GODOWON“. Accordingly, seizure orders had been passed demanding tax and penalties.
Therefore, the Petitioner filed two writ petitions for the same.
Issue:
Whether the goods were seized without jurisdiction?
Held:
The Hon’ble High Court of Allahabad in Writ Tax No. 57 of 2020 and Writ Tax No. 58 of 2020 dated August 6, 2022, held as under:
Relevant Provisions:
Section 129(3) of the CGST Act:
“Detention, seizure, and release of goods and conveyances in transit
129. (3) The proper officer detaining or seizing goods or conveyance shall issue a notice within seven days of such detention or seizure, specifying the penalty payable, and thereafter, pass an order within a period of seven days from the date of service of such notice, for payment of penalty under clause (a) or clause (b) of sub-section (1).”
DISCLAIMER:
The views expressed are strictly of the author and Indian tax Update. The
contents of this article are solely for informational purpose and for the
reader’s personal non-commercial use. It does not constitute professional
advice or recommendation of firm, Neither the author nor firm and its
affiliates accepts any liabilities for any loss or damage of any kind arising
out of any information in this article nor for any actions taken in reliance
thereon.
Professional Branding with Indian Tax Update
Professional Branding is very easy now.
Now you can also share the images with your specific details to your clients,
friends and on various social media platform. Subscribe Now and get and Best offers
It is the best option for
CA, CS, Advocate, MBA, CMA & other Tax Professionals
#suresoft #professional #ca #cs #cma
#advocate #indiantaxupdate #mba #taxprofessionals #branding